User talk:Mxw433/Benchmark III: Results
When discussing the figures, I think changing the style of the font when referencing a figure (such as using bold or italics) would assist the reader in making it clear what you are discussing and making it easier to navigate. Also in comparing Figure 5, the one sentence that begins "Metabolite then catalyze..." I believe that it should be metabolites unless its only one in which it should be catalyzes. I think that this section is very well organized and clear over all.--Thomas Schlechter (talk) 14:36, 21 April 2017 (EDT)
Overall really organized report. There is a small typo under figure comparison with original result in figure 5,7 and 9 - conversion and oscillating is misspelled. At the end, Varying under analysis is also a small typo. --Chiraag Lathia (talk) 15:17, 23 April 2017 (EDT)
- Benchmark submitted on time?
- Rubric submitted on time?
- Results described and compared to original paper?
- Have you addressed the original biological hypothesis?
- Figures and legends to show results?
- Discrepancies relative to original model?
- Yes - no discrepancies
- Uploaded Mathematica file?
On the whole, this is a very good first draft of the term paper. You could provide a bit more detail on each figure and its significance. The extension will be important for making this a truly excellent term paper. Keep up the good work!